Kahawai are about to be introduced into the Quota Management System. option4 have serious concerns that once again the Ministry of Fisheries (MFish) is putting the interests of commercial fishers above the rights of the public to access this fishery.
If you think the kahawai fishery
is in bad shape now you will be outraged at the Ministry of Fisheries
latest proposal. Not only do the Ministry believe there is no scarcity
of kahawai, they also do not accept there is conflict between commercial
and non-commercial fishers in this fishery.
your say - Click here
MFish proposes to issue commercial kahawai quota in perpetuity based on commercial catch histories and give the leftovers to the public.
Clearly the Ministry of Fisheries has decided to ignore the incessant public concerns regarding the poor state of the kahawai fisheries and conflict caused through excessive fishing over the years. Years of effort and participation in fisheries management forums by dedicated recreational fishers is to be dismissed and ignored.
The purse seine catch history will generate thousands of tonnes of quota developed through plundering this fishery to the detriment of all other users. Recreational leaders believe that using unsustainable target fishing as the basis for allocating quota is unfair and unjust and they are demanding that this catch history must not be used for allocating quota. It was generated at the expense of the rights of other users.
Ministry are proposing to reward those who have depleted the kahawai fishery by giving them excessive quotas. What’s more, the Ministry proposal will allow the kahawai stocks to continue to fall by 60% before these excessive quotas are reduced. This is totally unacceptable.
The Ministries proposal will inevitably inflame the already high level of conflict between commercial and non commercial fishers as the public witness the ongoing disappearance of this fishery. Ministry fail to mention, let alone address, this inevitable consequence of their proposal
Once quota is allocated there is no agreed upon process for adjusting the non commercial share in the future. Allocation decisions made now will be the basis of indefinite argument. We may well find ourselves stuck with what we get today through this process.
Make no mistake; the proposal as it stands will effectively steal the fish from the 1,000,000 non commercial fishers to prop up a handful of commercial fishing companies who choose to target kahawai; companies who think its better to annihilate your kahawai (school by school by school) to supply an Australian cray fisherman with bait (frozen, 20kg block, $A1.20 per kg) rather than leave them alone and risk you catching some to feed your family. Obviously the Ministry of Fisheries holds the same view.
If we do nothing, they could well get away with this lunacy!!
If you have read enough and wish to make your submission now, go to the bottom of the page and click on "Have your Say".
Otherwise keep reading - it only gets worse
Why is option4 so outraged
The Ministry of Fisheries (MFish) are going to ignore the public’s concerns about kahawai. This will result in our kahawai fishery as we once knew it being lost forever. This is theft – the dishonest taking of a public resource with no intention of returning it.
option4, NZ Big Game Fishing Council and NZ Recreational Fishing Council met with the Ministry on Friday 2 April 2004, to discuss the introduction of kahawai into the Quota Management System. We walked into the meeting feeling we had extremely strong points to make.
The Ministry made it abundantly clear that as far as they are concerned –
- there is no scarcity of kahawai
- there are no problems caused by purse seine fishing
It is hard to believe the sort of thinking that suggests that purse seining had been good for this fishery. We’ve got news for them.
It appears to us MFish
are going to write off our concerns about the decline in kahawai
schools as anecdotal. Why are they anecdote? Because the Ministry
has not conducted the science to prove one way or the other whether
what we are saying is true or not. This means that anecdote is all
we have. The reason for this is that the Ministry is either too
tight-fisted or too worried about the outcome if they go and investigate
our claims. We now have the Ministry openly declaring they do not
Even if they did believe us, they –
- do not accept there is any scarcity of kahawai
- conveniently forget they had to massively reduce the commercial catch limits in the 1990s out of concern for plummeting non commercial catches and the disappearance of surface schools
- fail to admit the fishery has not rebuilt since the 1990s and catch rates continue to decline, as has the size of the fish and the number of schools
- do not accept there has been an adverse impact on seabirds, kingfish and other dependant species.
If the Ministry won’t listen to and address our concerns then it is clearly becoming a political decision. Our concerns are being ignored and put down as being in the imaginations of the non-commercial fishers. We need to straighten up the play. We need you to tell the Minister of Fisheries your concerns directly.
The kahawai fishery may eventually be reduced to half of the current low level. If we allow this fishery to be managed at maximum sustainable yield then a stock size of 20% of the unfished stock will be their management target.
If you wish to
know more about how this fishery is to be managed under the Ministry's
proposal, then please
- not talking about rebuilding the fishery
- not talking about leaving it where it currently is
- continuing to allow the stock to be fished down, lower than it already is
- continuing to aggravate the conflict between non commercial and commercial fishers
- ignoring a highly valued recreational fishery by supporting a low value purse seine fishery
- not meeting their obligations by not having an agreed harvest strategy explaining their objectives for the kahawai fishery.
We get the strong impression this is all about putting kahawai into the Quota Management System and then letting the stakeholders fight it out downstream so the Crown can -
- avoid allocation scandals such as we have seen with scampi
- escape compensation issues by over allocating kahawai to the
- avoid having to make management decisions.
It is clear this is a contentious issue. It would appear that the path of least resistance for the Ministry is to add up current utilisation (what we are all catching) and call that sustainable for expediency, regardless of the impact on all non-commercial fishers. This will also leave the public battling with a $1.5 billion fishing industry for a fair non-commercial share after they have been issued their quota property rights.
Politicians have, in the past, acknowledged the issues in the kahawai fishery. Jeanette Fitzsimons of the Greens has previously said that kahawai should be made a recreational only species. Why would she say this if she weren’t aware of public concerns? We need to support politicians from any party who support us. If you want to thank Jeanette for her stance on kahawai and encourage her to continue click here.
is clearly stated in our submission. Commercial fishers should be
able to land kahawai caught as a genuine bycatch and have quota
available to cover those landings. It is the industrial fishing
method using spotter planes and purse seine vessels to target whole
schools that has done the damage. option4 is clear, the catch taken
by this method must be discounted from the commercial catch history.
Only this will prevent excessive quota being given as a reward to
those who have seriously damaged this fishery.
Our arguments are sound, we will lose only if you do nothing.
You’ve got to make these arguments to the politicians and fisheries managers.
the option4/NZBGFC/NZACA submission here
Have your say - Click here now!
[ footing ]